How 50mm Vacuum Insulation Panels Save RMB 4 Million Per Year – A Case Study of Vacuum Insulation Panels As 150mm Rock Wool Replacement

Let us begin with a real scenario.

Leadership of company A is amazed by an energy audit report that has just come out.

Annual electricity expenditure: RMB 22 million. Of this, more than 20% is attributable to avoidable heat loss caused by inadequate insulation performance.

In other words, over RMB 4 million per year in electricity cost of company A is effectively “lost to the atmosphere” through the insulation system.

This is not an isolated case. It is a common issue that substandard industrial insulation increases energy cost and reduce profit margin.

In this article, we use a simplified thermodynamic model to show why metal VIPs might be a better alternative for rock wool for industrial insulation.

I. Energy Consumption Comparison

To ensure a consistent comparison, we use following parameters:

Solutions:

Option A: 150 mm rock wool

Option B: 50 mm Supertech VAP vacuum insulation panel

II. Heat transfer calculation

Step 1: Heat transfer coefficient (K value)

The heat transfer coefficient of the rock wool solution is approximately 6.7 times higher than that of Supertech VAP, the metal vacuum insulation panel.

This means that, under the same temperature difference, the rock wool insulation system loses heat at around 6.7 times the rate.

Even at a thickness of 150 mm, rock wool cannot match the thermal performance of a 50 mm vacuum insulation panel.

Step 2: Calculate the heat loss power (Q value)

In simple terms:

For the 150 mm rock wool solution, the system generates 720 kW of heat loss in order to maintain the required operating temperature.

That is equivalent to running 720 separate 1 kW electric heating elements continuously.

By contrast, the 50 mm metal vacuum insulation panel solution reduces the heat loss to only 108 kW and subsequently substantially lowering the energy used.

Step 3: Annual electricity cost

Solution A:

Annual electricity use: 720 kW × 8,760 h = 6,307,200 kWh (approximately 6.31 million kWh)

Annual electricity cost: approximately RMB 4.73 million

Solution B:

Annual electricity use: 108 kW × 8,760 h = 946,080 kWh (approximately 950,000 kWh)

Annual electricity cost : approximately RMB 710,000

III.Overall Comparison: How Large Is the Difference?

(The carbon emission data is for reference only)

IV. Beyond Energy Efficiency: Three Overlooked Hidden Values

① Extending equipment lifespan

The greater the heat loss, the more frequently the heating system must operate at high load to compensate for the heat loss, which accelerates equipment aging, increases maintenance frequency and downtime.

② Enhancing stability of the production process

High-temperature processing demands extremely high temperature uniformity. Poor thermal insulation leads to frequent temperature fluctuations, directly impacting product yield—these losses are often harder to quantify than electricity costs.

③ Qualifying for emission compliance goals

As the carbon trading market continues to expand, better thermal performance of metal VIP is more valuable. Each reduction of one ton of carbon emissions can be converted into tradable carbon assets or help mitigate potential carbon tax costs.

Additional Value: Two Benefits in Volume and Weight

In industrial insulation where every inch of space counts, saving 100 mm is great.

Caveats:

All above data are based on theoretical calculations using a steady-state heat transfer model. In reality, the following factors may affect final outcomes:

① Heat bridge effect

Thermal bridges exist at the edges, joints, and fasteners of vacuum insulation panels, resulting in an actual overall thermal conductivity that exceeds the nominal value we mention.

② Dynamic temperature variation of thermal conductivity

The thermal conductivity of materials is not constant and varies with increasing temperature. The actual λ value under high-temperature conditions would be different than what is mentioned above.

③ Actual system operation time

The above calculation is made assuming machines are used 24/7.

④ Comprehensive calculation of Total Life Cycle Cost (LCC)

The upfront cost for vacuum insulation panels is typically higher. Because vacuum-insulated panels are more expensive.

In sum

When choosing an insulation material, energy economics should be considered.

In our case study,

even with a thickness of 150 mm, the rock wool solution still underperforms and results in RMB 4.73 million in annual electricity cost caused by heat loss.

By contrast, the 50 mm metal vacuum insulation panel solution reduces this cost to approximately RMB 710,000.

The cost difference is approximately RMB 4.02 million.

The upfront cost for implementing a high-performance insulation system can typically be fully recovered within 2 to 3 years.

It is both economical and ecological.

Under today’s energy-saving, emission-reduction, and carbon-neutrality trends, reassessing your insulation material may be a good choice.

#EnergyEfficiency #HeatLossReduction #IndustrialInsulation #VacuumInsulationPanel #MetalVIP #CarbonReduction #IndustrialEnergySaving #ThermalManagement